North Carolina Supreme Court rules family can sue over COVID-19 force-vaccination of teen without parental consent

• Lawsuit Allowed Over Non-Consensual Vaccination – The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that a mother, Emily Happel, and her son could sue their school board and a medical organization for administering a COVID-19 vaccine to her 14-year-old son without parental consent in 2021.
• PREP Act Immunity Limited – The court held that the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act), which grants broad immunity to vaccine administrators, does not shield defendants from constitutional claims, only from typical tort claims (e.g., injury or death).
• Constitutional Rights Upheld – The majority opinion emphasized that parental rights and bodily autonomy are protected under state law, rejecting arguments that the PREP Act allows violations of fundamental constitutional rights.
• Split Court Decision – The ruling was not unanimous; dissenting justices argued that the PREP Act’s immunity should apply broadly, including to constitutional claims, except in cases of “willful misconduct” causing death or serious injury.

A mother’s constitutional rights were violated when her 14-year-old son was force-vaccinated with the deadliest jab in the universe, the blood-clotting mRNA Covid stab, without her consent, and the North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled in her favor. It’s no wonder the Supreme Court Justices are NOT paid off by Big Pharma to rule in favor of the Vaccine Industrial Complex, since most cases like this one get thrown out of courts and proxied by the fake kangaroo “court” invented by Pharma that uses slush funds to censor vaccine horror stories.

Emily Happel and her teenage son can proceed suing local school board and medical organization responsible for injecting her teen son with deadly spike prions

Happel’s son, Tanner Smith, was illegally force-injected with a deadly Covid-19 spike prion jab, that creates millions of prions in the blood forever. The vaccine industrial complex and all the vaccine fanatic cultists often do this sort of thing on purpose out of spite and for revenge against what they call “anti-vaxxers.” They’ll often say it was on accident or something like that, but that’s just a cover story. Now, they may be paying a hefty price for their insidious acts of medical malpractice, especially if the boy suffers long-term health damage, like most people are suffering now who got the deadly Fauci Flu stabs.

The lower courts, of course, ruled in favor of the Vaccine Industrial Complex, even though administrators never got consent from Tanner’s parents to stab him with known carcinogens and neurotoxins, claiming the PREP Act allows them to jab any kid anytime with experimental “vaccines” without parental consent.

Steven Walker, an attorney representing Happel and her son, told The Epoch Times in an email: “We are very pleased with the Court’s ruling. While we would have, of course, loved to see the battery claim reinstated as well, we believe that the Court decision was very favorable in the main on the case and have no real complaints. “I believe the case is important even outside the issue of the PREP Act in that the Court gave its clearest explanation to date concerning the rights of parents to make medical decisions for their children under the North Carolina constitution,” and Walker continued… “The PREP Act has a purpose, and that purpose is to provide immunity protections in situations when it might be difficult to determine the safety of a countermeasure during a time of crisis. It was never intended to allow the government to trample on the clear constitutional rights of its citizens.”

Bookmark Infections.news to get the latest updates about the engineered “bird flu pandemic.”

Sources for this article include:

Pandemic.news

NaturalNews.com

SHTFplan.com

ZeroHedge.com