09/22/2024 / By Ethan Huff
The DNA testing company 23andMe is in an upheaval after the entire board, save for Anne Wojcicki, the sister of deceased YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki, has resigned.
Since 2021 when it had its initial public offering (IPO) via the Richard Branson-backed Virgin Group SPAC, 23andMe’s stock price has plummeted by more than 95 percent to just $0.35 per share.
“Roelof Botha (Sequoia Capital) and Patrick Chung (xFund) are among those resigning,” reported Disclose.tv (@disclosetv on X). “Anne Wojcicki plans to take the company private.”
The seven independent directors of 23andMe resigned in protest of Wojcicki’s plans to take the company private. She apparently did not offer a high enough share price premium to make the sale worthwhile.
“It is in the best interests of the company’s shareholders that we resign,” is what the board said before leaving Wojcicki to do whatever it is she plans to do, obviously for her own personal benefit at the expense of shareholders.
???All the board members of 23andMe resigned along with other resignations across the corporate world and governments.
They are in panic since the Diddy arrest.
This ties to the COVID Vaccine as well. The vaxx was made in a way not to target certain genetic predispositions.… https://t.co/Ss2kI3Xpdu pic.twitter.com/1pIAyMTuEh
— #??? ??????? (@WarHorizon) September 18, 2024
(Related: Remember when the man who sent lizard saliva to 23andMe for DNA testing was told by the company that the sample was half Ashkenazi Jewish?)
Responding to the rejection, Wojcicki said she is “surprised and disappointed” because in her eyes, taking 23andMe private represents the “best opportunity for long-term success.”
Wojcicki talks a big game, but company directors say she has not yet submitted a “fully financed, fully diligence, actionable proposal.”
“While we continue to wholeheartedly support the company’s mission and believe deeply in the value of the personalized health and wellness offering that you have articulated, it is also clear that we differ on the strategic direction for the company going forward,” reads an official statement from the resigning board to Wojcicki.
“Because of that difference and because of your concentrated voting power, we believe that it is in the best interests of the company’s shareholders that we resign.”
There seems to be a serious corruption problem within the Wojcicki family, which time and time again has engaged in deceptive, constitutionally offensive behavior. Now that her sister Susan, along with Susan’s son Marco Troper, are dead, Anne is capturing headlines as one of the last remaining members of the Wojcicki clan in Big Business with questionable character.
“They’ve already sold their entire genetic databases to the CCP … what’s the point of their continued existence?” asked someone on X about 23andMe.
“Let me guess, all the data was hacked and stolen? Or sold?” wrote another, speculating that there is much more than meets the eye with this sudden departure of the entire 23andMe board.
“Calling it now: they got breached,” echoed another.
Ever since January 2020 when the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic” was launched by the world’s power brokers, a cadre of CEOs has resigned under mysterious circumstances. What is happening at 23andMe right now is just another in a long line of suspicious corporate actions.
“They’re about to release another genetic bioweapon, aren’t they?” another X user pondered about the situation.
“Mission has been accomplished,” speculated another, adding that 23andMe “built a comprehensive DNA database that is now in the hands of the U.S. and Chinese governments.”
“They were involved in some seriously dark stuff, including brokering DNA info about bloodlines, family history, and potentially providing information for seriously dark medical experiments,” said another.
More related news coverage can be found at Chaos.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
23andMe, Anne Wojcicki, Collapse, conspiracy, corruption, deception, DNA, privacy
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 SCIENTIFIC NEWS